Andrew Ching Hong Yung (ayung@physics.ubc.ca) Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:14:48 -0800 (PST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- New Message to:eece379@listhost.ece.ubc.ca
- Reply to:Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?
- Next message: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Lashin: "Re:assignment5 question1"
- Next in thread: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"
- Reply: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:14:48 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Ching Hong Yung <ayung@physics.ubc.ca> Subject: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?I know this is a little late, but here goes: Do we even need to consider the clock (tCK = 33 ns)? None of the timing diagrams seem to explicitly include it, and we know we can already assume that there are no wait states or address holds or bus idle cycles (W=DT=HI=0). I'm actually a little bit confused about why we need to include tCK into any timing diagram (like the example on page 7 in the timing analysis notes). Thanks! -ANdrew
- Next message: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"
- Previous message: Jonathan Lashin: "Re:assignment5 question1"
- Next in thread: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"
- Reply: Ed Casas: "Re: Assignment #5: what does the clock have to do with it?"