Eric Young (eyoung@interchange.ubc.ca) Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:25:44 -0800 (PST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- New Message to:eece485@listhost.ece.ubc.ca
- Reply to:Re: address decoders
- Next message: Danny Kuan: "Final Exam"
- Previous message: Azuma Hashimoto: "Re: address decoders"
- Maybe in reply to: Azuma Hashimoto: "address decoders"
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:25:44 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Young <eyoung@interchange.ubc.ca> Subject: Re: address decodersThey'll still be used to give the 2 LSB portion ofthe address. It's just that the decoder doesn't need to know them, since they don't give any significant information about which device needs to be turned on. Eric On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Azuma Hashimoto wrote: > Thanks, > do you know what the two LSB are being used for? > > >The two missing bits are the two LSB, which will always be active, no > >matter what device (RAM, I/O, etc.) is being used. The I/O was 2 bits > >(the smallest of any of the devices), and the CPU 20, so 20-2=18 > > > >Eric > > > >On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Azuma Hashimoto wrote: > > > > > Hi. I have a question about exercise 7 from the microcomputer > >architecture > > > handout. In it we are supposed to draw out a diagram for a > >microcomputer. > > > But when you did it in class the address decoder only gets an 18 bit > > > address? > > > Why is that? Is it because the I/O chip could always potentially be > >active > > > with any other activity? So that when you have the EPROM and I/O active > >at > > > the same time the address decoder needs > > > 16(for EPROM) + 2(for I/O) = 18 bits????? > > > > >_____________________________________________________________________________________ > > > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : > >http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________________________________________________ > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com > >
- Next message: Danny Kuan: "Final Exam"
- Previous message: Azuma Hashimoto: "Re: address decoders"
- Maybe in reply to: Azuma Hashimoto: "address decoders"