Re: Ass #1 problem 3-21

zhipeng wang (zhipengw@ece.ubc.ca) Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:30:00 -0800 (PST) 

Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:30:00 -0800 (PST)
From: zhipeng wang <zhipengw@ece.ubc.ca>
Subject: Re: Ass #1 problem 3-21



I agree with you!:)

Best regards,

Zhipeng

On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Amr Mohamed wrote:

> 
> 
> But variance is 0dB not 0. So, the variance is actually 1=10^0 which means
> that X is not constant, isn't that correct?
> 
> Also, I think the PL(d0) in both cases (forward link and the co-channel
> link) is the same because the bases have the same Gain and d0 is
> constant=1Km. So, if we need the ratio of the two paths loss, we do not
> actually need Gm and Gb or the frecuency, is that correct?
> 
> Rgds,
> Amr
> 
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 08:35:28AM -0800, gordon yang wrote:
> >
> > > > Hint: the sum of two uncorrelated Gaussian RV is also Gaussian
> > > > RV.
> > >
> > > For problem 3-21, since the variance of B1's path loss is 0, do
> > > we actually just have one RV?
> >
> > Oh, my.  Yes, you're right.  I didn't notice that one "RV" was
> > actually a constant.  That should simplify things.
> >
> 
> 
>