Ed Casas (edc@ece.ubc.ca) Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:41:02 -0700
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
- New Message to:eece379@listhost.ece.ubc.ca
- Reply to:Re: your mail
- Next message: Riley Devlin: "L1C and L1D people"
- Previous message: Edwin Chan: "(no subject)"
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 22:41:02 -0700 From: Ed Casas <edc@ece.ubc.ca> Subject: Re: your mail> In today class, Dr. Casas said that we have to avoid using > different clock signals whenever possible. I just wonder why > computers nowadays use 3 different clock speeds: one for CPU, > one for system bus, one for SDRAM. Will it better to use just > one clock speed?? Different clocks are unavoidable in large systems (otherwise the whole word would have to be hooked up to one master clock!). However, interfaces between different clock domains have to be designed with care to make sure they'll operate reliably. We'll learn about some of these issues (e.g. metastability) later in the course. I believe the three clocks you mention in your example are actually synchronous since they are generated by dividing or multiplying one master clock. PS: Please make sure your e-mail has a meaningful `Subject:' line and wrap your text so there are less than 80 characters per line. Thanks, -- Ed Casas edc@ece.ubc.ca http://casas.ece.ubc.ca +1 604 822-2592
- Next message: Riley Devlin: "L1C and L1D people"
- Previous message: Edwin Chan: "(no subject)"